Among the artists whose merits have
been passionately disputed, not only by the public at large, but also by
other famous musicians, is certainly Johannes Brahms. With Brahms it is not
as with Wagner a question of agreeing or disagreeing with his principles or
his daring innovations, but simply a liking or disliking of his music.
Someone named him "the last of the classics" or, like Bulow, made him a
member of the "Three B's Trinity," Bach, Beethoven, Brahms. Others, like
Tschaikowsky, find that he lacks the chief thing in music - beauty. After
all it is entirely a matter of taste. There are many musicians who, even
recognizing the seriousness of his aims, and the extent of his knowledge, do
not like his music. Other, on the contrary, swear that every note form his
pen is a gem.
I shall try to navigate impartially
between these two antagonistic cliffs and to find out what in his works
captivated the admiration of one part of the music world and what on the
contrary aroused the opposition of the other.
I Brahm's early days all his
surroundings were musical and everything tended to foster the inclination he
inherited from his father who was a prominent member of the Hamburg
orchestra. Also, his teacher, Marxsen, had the strongest influence on his
subsequent work, fostering his comprehension and devotion to the older
masters, especially Bach and Beethoven.